ABOUT THE BES  |  CONTACT US  |  HOW TO JOIN  |  LOG IN  |  SITE MAP  |  HELP   Giraffe
BESBritish Ecological Society
AREA OF INTEREST:
  General  
  Research  
  Students  
  Teachers  
  Journalists  
  Authors  
   

BRITISH ECOLOGICAL SOCIETY / ACES PRESS RELEASE

12 August 2008

Scientists call for trial of “hen harrier ceiling”

As the grouse shooting season gets under way, two scientists involved in high-profile studies of hen harriers and red grouse at Langholm Moor in Scotland have called for field trials of a “ceiling” on harrier numbers in an attempt to end the long running conflict between conservationists and grouse managers.

In a new paper published in the British Ecological Society's Journal of Applied Ecology, Dr Simon Thirgood and Professor Steve Redpath from the Aberdeen Centre for Environmental Sustainability (ACES) suggest the most effective way of improving the conservation status of harriers on grouse moors might be to apply local “ceilings” to the number of breeding birds.

High densities of hen harriers are incompatible with driven grouse shooting and consequently, gamekeepers illegally kill these protected birds of prey. As a result, harriers are absent from large areas of apparently suitable moorland habitat.

According to Professor Redpath: “All moors can cope with some harriers, but few gamekeepers allow any of these predators to breed because of the fear that numbers will subsequently flourish. A ceiling scheme is a way of encouraging grouse managers to put an end to illegal killing of harriers, safe in the knowledge that numbers will not reach densities where they can threaten the viability of their grouse moors.”

The authors propose a large-scale trial where a ceiling to harrier numbers on grouse moors could be agreed locally by interested parties, and that additional birds could then be safely moved to other areas.

“If successful, this could prove to be a way to both minimise the local impact of predation on grouse moors and increase the national population of harriers – providing a ‘win-win’ situation for harrier conservation and grouse management,” Professor Redpath says.

Progress in reconciling the two camps had reached a stand-still with both sides distrusting each other, and a ceiling system is worth a “serious look” as an acceptable compromise, he adds.

According to Professor Redpath: “Hunters have been slow to recognise that illegal killing of raptors is unacceptable in 21st Century society where there is strong support for conservation. Conservationists, on the other hand, have been unwilling to compromise over any form of intervention to limit harrier densities, citing European legislation which prevents such action.”

“We feel that a fundamental change in attitude is required from all parties to resolve the conflict between harriers and grouse. If those involved genuinely wish to strive for a solution then compromises will be required and attitudes to predators, their control, and their protection, will have to be modified to accommodate changed circumstances,” he says.

Last September, a £3m follow up to the Langholm project was launched by a partnership of organisations including Scottish Natural Heritage, RSPB, the Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust, Natural England and Buccleuch Estates. The ten year project focuses on the use of “diversionary feeding” – providing alternative food for the harriers to reduce their predation on grouse chicks.

But Professor Redpath says questions remain about the effectiveness of this approach: “Our earlier work showed that feeding harriers can greatly reduce predation rates on grouse chicks. However, we still do not know how feeding will affect harrier numbers in the long term and indeed whether fed harriers and grouse shooting can coexist.”

“Some of these issues will be addressed by ongoing work at Langholm. However, we suggest that the quickest way of finding an effective solution to this problem is to simultaneously make progress on different fronts – it is sensible to test a ‘harrier ceiling’ now, and not wait for ten years until the Langholm Moor Demonstration Project is complete,” Professor Redpath concludes.

Simon Thirgood and Steve Redpath (2008). Hen harriers and red grouse: science, politics and human-wildlife conflict. Journal of Applied Ecology, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01519.x, is published online on 12 August 2008.

Notes for editors

1. Professor Steve Redpath, Aberdeen Centre for Environmental Sustainability, is available for interview on Thursday 7 August and Monday 11 August, tel: +44 (0)1224 272651.

2. Copies of the paper are available at http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/121376684/PDFSTART.

3. The Journal of Applied Ecology is published by Wiley-Blackwell for the British Ecological Society. Contents lists are available at www.blackwellpublishing.com/jpe.

4. The British Ecological Society is a learned society, a registered charity and a company limited by guarantee. Established in 1913 by academics to promote and foster the study of ecology in its widest sense, the Society has 4,000 members in the UK and abroad. Further information is available at www.britishecologicalsociety.org.

5. The Aberdeen Centre for Environment Sustainability (ACES) was launched in April 2008 as a collaboration between the Macaulay Institute and University of Aberdeen. ACES brings together natural and social scientists to carry out inter-disciplinary research on environmental sustainability in a broad range of contexts worldwide. ACES is supported by a grant from the SRDG and the Macaulay Development Trust. www.aces.ac.uk.

6. The Joint Raptor Study (or Langholm I) was conducted by a unique consortium of conservation organisations during 1992-1997 on six Scottish grouse moors with the most detailed work undertaken on the Buccleuch Estate at Langholm. The main conclusion was that predation by high densities of hen harriers could limit grouse populations and reduce shooting bags. Subsequent research by the same consortium during 1998-2000 tested the effectiveness of diversionary feeding of hen harriers as a method of mitigating conflicts with grouse management. The work at Langholm has resulted in more than 30 peer-reviewed scientific publications.

7. The Langholm Moor Demonstration Project (or Langholm II) is a collaborative project conducted by the Buccleuch Group, Scottish Natural Heritage, the Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds and Natural England. The project was launched in September 2007 and will last for ten years at a budgeted cost of £3 million. The main aim of the project is to restore Langholm as a viable grouse moor in the presence of natural populations of hen harriers. The project plans to meet these objectives through a programme of habitat management, legal predator control and diversionary feeding of hen harriers.