<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: All Party Parliamentary Environment Group Discuss the Climate Change Act</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.britishecologicalsociety.org/blog/2009/02/16/all-party-parliamentary-environment-group-discuss-the-climate-change-act/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.britishecologicalsociety.org/blog/2009/02/16/all-party-parliamentary-environment-group-discuss-the-climate-change-act/</link>
	<description>Advancing ecology and making it count</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:42:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Cliff</title>
		<link>http://www.britishecologicalsociety.org/blog/2009/02/16/all-party-parliamentary-environment-group-discuss-the-climate-change-act/#comment-374</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Cliff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2010 12:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishecologicalsociety.org/blog/blog/2009/02/16/all-party-parliamentary-environment-group-discuss-the-climate-change-act/#comment-374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We today have the 24 hour day - this leads to an absence of any nocturnal habitat and causes circadian disruption to ALL of life on the &quot;civilised&quot; Earth. Why is the &quot;hidden&quot; harm of the 24 hour day tolerated? Does profit preclude precaution and prevail over any precaution? Do we have to wait until we are just too late and have the proof of the harm being done? Do we face a future in which we will be JTL instead of being JIT?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We today have the 24 hour day &#8211; this leads to an absence of any nocturnal habitat and causes circadian disruption to ALL of life on the &#8220;civilised&#8221; Earth. Why is the &#8220;hidden&#8221; harm of the 24 hour day tolerated? Does profit preclude precaution and prevail over any precaution? Do we have to wait until we are just too late and have the proof of the harm being done? Do we face a future in which we will be JTL instead of being JIT?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.britishecologicalsociety.org/blog/2009/02/16/all-party-parliamentary-environment-group-discuss-the-climate-change-act/#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishecologicalsociety.org/blog/blog/2009/02/16/all-party-parliamentary-environment-group-discuss-the-climate-change-act/#comment-373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With 80% of the homes in 2020 already built, existing stock must provide huge CO2 savings,yet &quot;A&quot; rated windows gain more energy than it loses, so why is VAT charged?????&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The industry has great products, the government must support its growth to improve the UK stock.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;A Burgess MD &lt;br/&gt;masterframe windows ltd]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With 80% of the homes in 2020 already built, existing stock must provide huge CO2 savings,yet &#8220;A&#8221; rated windows gain more energy than it loses, so why is VAT charged?????</p>
<p>The industry has great products, the government must support its growth to improve the UK stock.</p>
<p>A Burgess MD <br />masterframe windows ltd</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Actve</title>
		<link>http://www.britishecologicalsociety.org/blog/2009/02/16/all-party-parliamentary-environment-group-discuss-the-climate-change-act/#comment-372</link>
		<dc:creator>Actve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishecologicalsociety.org/blog/blog/2009/02/16/all-party-parliamentary-environment-group-discuss-the-climate-change-act/#comment-372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Suggest you to provide link to&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.energyenvironmentforum.com&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.energyenvironmentforum.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;and encourage your readers to use the Energy Environment Forum and get a link back !&lt;br/&gt;energyenvironmentforum at gmail dot com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suggest you to provide link to</p>
<p><a HREF="http://www.energyenvironmentforum.com" REL="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.energyenvironmentforum.com</a></p>
<p>and encourage your readers to use the Energy Environment Forum and get a link back !<br />energyenvironmentforum at gmail dot com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>