"The BES' support to the TBA's field course students has literally helped launch their careers."

Rosie Trevelyan Dir, Tropical Biology Association

Magpie Controversy Erupts in the Media

British ecological controversy has suddenly found itself in the media glare, as wildlife charities publicly dispute the role of magpies in limiting songbird populations.

The Songbird Survival Trust has urged people to trap and kill magpies over the next three months in order to conserve populations of song thrushes, blackbirds and house sparrows. They blame the birds for contributing to recent population declines by raiding nests and eating eggs and young. Nick Forde, a trustee of the SST, said “I don’t like the idea of harming animals but if they are destroying our biodiversity, then we have to take action. Unless the population of some predators is controlled, there is little, if any, hope that the small bird populations can recover.”

The Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 specifically provides for the culling of magpies, as long as it is done humanely and for a specific purpose, such as bird conservation.

However, groups including the RSPB have spoken out against the cull. A spokesman said: “We do not think that trapping and killing of magpies is justified in most situations. In certain circumstances on reserves to protect ground-nesting birds such as lapwings it may be necessary to reduce magpie numbers. But we do not think there is any case for people to do it in their own gardens and it will make absolutely no difference to arrest the decline of songbirds throughout the country.”

Chris Packham, the naturalist and TV presenter, responded even more forcefully in the Guardian, accusing the Trust of “kneejerk ornithological racism” and “outdated views built on a foundation of medieval superstition”.

Whilst acknowledging the role magpies play as predators, opponents of the cull point instead to the intensification of farming practices, pollution and habitat loss as the main reasons for declining songbird populations. They argue that the limited research that has been done does not single out magpies as the cause, and that anecdotal observational evidence may be overly influencing opinions.

To read more, visit the Times.

This entry was posted in Birds, Conservation, Ecology, UK, Wildlife Management. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Magpie Controversy Erupts in the Media

  1. Dave Austin says:

    Over thge last 2 – 3 years in the Sheffield S10 and S11 districts ( a heavily wooded area between the city and the Peak District ) there has been a very noticeable drop in the general population of birds, especially blue, great and coal tits and grey wagtails. Around 6 years ago the area was teaming with magpies (I counted over twenty in one tree alone at that time).
    The magpie population has dropped along with the rest of the bird population until last summer there was one young pair only in the immediate area. Having once been an enemy to the magpie, I took it upon myself to feed this pair (with dry cat food) and watched them bring up two young (of which there is now no sign). The pair have nested again this year and still visit my feeding station several times a day. I’m looking forward to seeing their offspring later in the summer and think it would be a great shame if magpies were to be targeted for a cull when they appear to be suffering equally along with other species.

Leave a Reply

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close