Session list page
Back to session list | Personal timetableOral Session 25: Ecosystem Ecology and Dynamics
Thursday 20 December
| Add | 11:30 | It has to be worth a try? Individual-based modelling of entire ecosystems, worldwide |
| Drew Purves (Microsoft Research), Tim Newbold (Microsoft Research and UNEP-WCMC), Derek Tittensor (Microsoft Research and UNEP-WCMC), Mike Harfoot (MIcrosoft Research and UNEP-WCMC), Stephen Emmott (Microsoft Research), Jon Hutton (UNEP-WCMC), Jorn Scharlemann (UNEP-WCMC) | ||
We present The Madingley Model, which simulates how the structure and function of ecosystems emerges from the ecology of individuals. Combining various aspects of ecology (e.g. foraging, metabolism) with a cohort-based approximation, we simulate every organism in each 1 x 1 degree grid-cell on Earth for 1000 years. Do emergent life histories and ecosystem properties look like the real world? |
||
| Add | 11:45 | Development of a model for ecological forecasting |
| Matthew Evans (Queen Mary University of London), Aristides Moustakas (Queen Mary University of London) | ||
We review the requirements for a model designed to predict future state of a forest ecosystem and draw parallels with models of population dynamics. Good data available on some aspects of forest ecology but there are large gaps. We outline these gaps and discuss how they might be filled. We present results from a model of a deciduous woodland. |
||
| Add | 12:00 | Beta diversity and species area relationships of forest soil food webs |
| Christoph Digel (Goettingen University), Franziska Grischkat (Goettingen University), Ulrich Brose (Goettingen University) | ||
We analysed beta diversity, species area relationships and food web structural similarity in 48 soil food webs across forests in Germany. Community similarity decreased with increasing differences of environmental factors and with increasing geographic distance. Beta diversity was more influenced by geographic distance. Food web structure was influenced by environmental factors but not by geographic distance. |
||
| Add | 12:15 | Enabling a joined-up approach to conservation? Useful metrics from a novel individual-based model of entire ecosystems, worldwide |
| Michael Harfoot (UNEP-WCMC Microsoft Research), Tim Newbold (UNEP-WCMC Microsoft Research), Derek Tittensor (UNEP-WCMC Microsoft Research), Matthew Smith (Microsoft Research), Jorn Scharlemann (UNEP-WCMC), Drew Purves (Microsoft Research) | ||
Evidence based decision making in conservation requires quantitative forecasts of the impacts of human pressures and the consequences of mitigation actions. We demonstrate several conservation relevant metrics calculated using a novel, individual- and process-based model of global ecosystems. Could such metrics of ecosystem state (e.g. stability, resilience, functional diversity) enable a joined-up approach to conservation? |
||
| Add | 12:30 | Environmental metagenetics reveal heterogeneous natural drivers of inter-phylum microbial metazoan diversity in contrasting estuarine ecosystems. |
| Simon Creer (Bangor University), Delphine Lallias (Bangor University), Jan Hiddink (Bangor University), Simon Neill (Bangor University), Way Sung (Indiana University), Kelley Thomas (University of New Hampshire), Margaret Packer (Natural History Museum London), Natalie Barnes (Natural History Museum London), Tim Ferrero (Natural History Museum London), Neil Hall (Liverpool University), Vera Fonseca (University of Algarve), P John D Lambshead (University of Southampton) | ||
Understanding ecosystems requires synthesis between biodiversity, function and the role of environmental stressors on community assemblages. Here, metagenetic (the meta-molecular genetic analysis of biodiversity) analyses revealed heterogeneous communities and drivers of interstitial microbial metazoan diversity in two contrasting estuarine ecosystems. Accordingly, microbial eukaryotic biodiversity is unlikely to adhere to generalised biodiversity models and is strongly affected by local ecosystem effects. |
||
| Add | 12:45 | Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of woody species in a heathland to forest succession |
| Sebastian Kepfer Rojas (University of Copenhagen), Inger Kappel Schmidt (University of Copenhagen), Torben Riis-Nielsen (University of Copenhagen), Kris Verheyen (University of Gent), Johannes Ransijn (University of Copenhagen) | ||
Since a heathland was left to free succession in the late 1800´s, the development of the community of woody species has been monitored. Successional pathways and rates are analyzed, both in time and space and in relation to former land use. Furthermore, the effects of dispersal limitation as a driver of community composition is discussed. |
||
| Add | 13:00 | Subsidies from Saline Lakes to their Catchments - a Spatial and Temporal Stable Isotope Study |
| Philip Sanders (Queen Mary University of London), Stephen Brooks (Natural History Museum), Jonathan Grey (Queen Mary University of London) | ||
The extreme environmental conditions of saline lakes result in ‘simple’ yet often highly productive aquatic communities which can be an ‘oasis’ of energy to their typically depauperate catchment. Using δ13C and δ15N isotope ratios we explore the aquatic-terrestrial link from donor soda lake ecosystems via two vectors: periodic, high energy, chironomid emergence; and continuous, low energy, flamingo feather detritus. |
||
| Add | 13:15 | Productivity of New Zealand indigenous forest does not increase with temperature |
| David Coomes (Cambridge), Oliver Flores (Cirad Reunion), Robert Holdaway (Landcare Research New Zealand), Emily Lines (University College London) | ||
It is widely believed that forest productivity is regulated by air temperature. We show that most New Zealand tree species do indeed grow faster in warmer places. However, shifts in forest composition result in stand-level productivity being almost invariant of temperature. We discuss this surprising finding in relation to global patterns of productivity and metabolism. |