Session list page
Back to session list | Personal timetableOral Session 28: Food Webs Networks and Complexity
Thursday 20 December
| Add | 11:30 | Trophic groups and modules: two levels of group detection in food webs |
| Elisa Thébault (UMR 7618 Bioemco CNRS), Benoit Gauzens (UMR 7618 Bioemco CNRS), Gérard Lacroix (UMR 7618 Bioemco CNRS), Stéphane Legendre (UMR 7625 Ecologie et Evolution CNRS) | ||
Historically, food web have been grouped in trophic groups. However, recent algorithms identified modules in food webs. Using a novel algorithm detecting trophic groups, we show that trophic groups are better descriptors of food web structure than modules. We further reveal a hierarchical structure of food webs: modules partition food webs into different energetic pathways, then partitioned into trophic groups. |
||
| Add | 11:45 | Body size scaling within a competition network |
| Kristy Udy (University of Canterbury), Ximena Nelson (University of Canterbury), Jason Tylianakis (University of Canterbury) | ||
Anthropogenic threats influence the structure of interaction networks. Body size can predict predator-prey interactions, but competition is seldom included in ecological networks. I observed dung-associated-community interactions in protected and unprotected areas of an Afromontane forest reserve. The competition network structure changed in protected areas of the forest, and the outcome of interactions was influenced by body-size ratios between competitors. |
||
| Add | 12:00 | Cascading extinctions of carnivores following over-harvesting |
| Dirk Sanders (University of Bern), Louis Sutter (Univesity of Bern), Frank Van Veen (University of Exeter) | ||
Carnivore species can have positive indirect effects on each other, which increases the persistence of populations. Overharvesting of one carnivore species may therefore lead to cascading extinctions of other carnivores. We demonstrate this effect in experimental insect communities, with carnivore species seperated by four trophic links, illustrating a mechanism for horizontal extinction cascades. |
||
| Add | 12:15 | Interconnecting mutualistic and antagonistic networks: what consequences for the relationships between network structure and community stability? |
| Alix Sauve (CERSP UMR 7204 (MNHN CNRS) Bioemco UMR 7618 (CNRS UPMC ENS IRD AgroParisTech)), Colin Fontaine (CERSP UMR 7204 (MNHN CNRS)), Elisa Thébault (Bioemco UMR 7618 (CNRS UPMC ENS IRD AgroParisTech)) | ||
In a theoretical approach, we show the robustness of relationships between network complexity and stability to the interconnection: mutualistic complexity fosters stability, in contrast with antagonistic complexity. These effects are not restricted to each sub-network, as the two sub-networks influence each other through cascading extinctions. Thus, considering interconnection between different network types is key to understanding species persistence. |
||
| Add | 12:30 | Cheddar - analysis and visualisation of ecological communities in R |
| Lawrence Hudson (Imperial College London), Rob Emerson (Concurrent Logic), Gareth Jenkins (Queen Mary University of London), Katrin Layer (Queen Mary University of London), Mark Ledger (University of Birmingham), Doris Pichler (Queen Mary University of London), Murray Thompson (Queen Mary University of London), Eoin O'Gorman (Queen Mary University of London), Guy Woodward (Queen Mary University of London), Daniel Reuman (Imperial College London) | ||
We introduce Cheddar - a flexible R package that provides a comprehensive range of food-web analyses and plots, focussing on data that are augmented with estimates of body mass and numerical abundance. This unified package has the potential to improve research efficiency and to serve as a unified framework for future development. |
||
| Add | 12:45 | Diversity loss at multiple trophic levels - impacts on food web structure. |
A manipulative field experiment was carried out in Lough Hyne marine reserve to examine the effect of diversity loss at multiple trophic levels. Impacts on species richness, number of trophic links, food chain length and connectance were detected, with the lowest levels occurring after the loss of diversity from just one trophic level. |
||
| Add | 13:00 | The effect of Large Woody Debris on Stream Community Structure and Ecosystem Functioning |
| Murray Thompson (University College London), Stephen Brooks (Natural History Museum), Carl Sayer (University College London), Guy Woodward (Queen Mary University of London), Victoria Warren (Queen Mary University of London) | ||
River habitat enhancement is often used to reinstate ecosystem properties. To test the effectiveness of large woody debris as a restoration tool, five chalk streams were sampled before and after at control and treatment sites. Food web properties including connectance, complexity and allometric scaling have been used to measure community response. |
||
| Add | 13:15 | Linking traits to species’ importance in food webs |
| Michael Pocock (NERC Centre for Ecology Hydrology) | ||
How can we assess the importance of individual species within ecological networks (e.g. food webs)? Here we demonstrate a novel way of assessing importance and show how the importance of individual plant species relates to their traits. We use field data of a farmland food web with plants and 12 animal guilds and comprising trophic, mutualistic and parasitic interactions. |