"Running a BES symposium united academia, consultancy, governmental organisations and charities."

Lesley Batty Symposium Organiser

Sessions

Session list page

Back to session list | Personal timetable

Oral Session 49: Biodiversity Management and Policy

Thursday 20 December

Add 09:00 Conservation-development trade-offs and the challenge of translatingconservation science into policy: some insights from the Brazilian Amazon
    Toby Gardner (University of Cambridge)
   

The expansion of agriculture and exploitation of natural forest resources across the tropics presents one of the greatest environmental challenges of the 21st Century. I present the conceptual framework and initial results of the Sustainable Amazon Network (RAS); a multi-disciplinary research initiative involving more than 30 partners assessing both social and ecological dimensions of land-use sustainability in eastern Brazilian Amazonia

Add 09:15 Collaborative conservation workshops to solve entrenched issues, an integrated approach: A case study on how to reduce the risk of ships accidently hitting large whales
    Richard Bull (ORCA)
   

Industry and scientists worked together during a 1.5 day integrated workshop to identify barriers and opportunities to an issue where little progress has been made.  Participants identified novel solutions that might not have been possible without industry involvement. We outline key lessons applicable to conservation issues concerning industry and private enterprise.

Add 09:30 Conservation of endemic floras through adaptive management. The case of Sicily, Malta and their satellite islands
    Giuseppe Bonanno (University of Catania)
   

Adaptive management is proposed as a tool to develop strategies for the conservation of endemic floras. The adaptive approach was applied to the endemic plants from Sicily, Malta and their satellite islands whose biodiversity, IUCN status, and distribution patterns, were analyzed as a preliminary step to set clear goals and conservation priorities.

Add 09:45 Conserving the birds of Uganda's Banana-Coffee Arc: Land Sparing and Land Sharing Compared
    Mark Hulme (British Trust for Ornithology), Juliet Vickery (RSPB), Rhys Green (University of Cambridge), Ben Phalan (University of Cambridge), Dan Chamberlaine (University of Turin), Derek Pomeroy (Makerere University), Dianah Nalwanga (NatureUganda), David Mushabe (NatureUganda), Raymond Katebaka (Makerere University), Phil Atkinson (British Trust for Ornithology)
   

Following bird surveys and assessments of agricultural yield we found that more bird species overall, and more with smaller range sizes, would benefit from high-yield farming in Uganda, if used as part of a strategy to reduce forest loss, than from low-yield farming and land sharing. This compares favourably with similar surveys in Ghana and India.

Add 10:00 Egypt’s Protected Area network under future climate change.
    Katie Leach (Queen's University Belfast), Samy Zalat (Taibah University El-Ula Branch), Francis Gilbert (University of Nottingham)
   

Concerns about the impacts of climate change loom large among biodiversity scientists. In this study we use two techniques in conservation science, first, to estimate the likely impacts on the distributions of mammals and butterflies in Egypt (MaxEnt), and second, to measure the effectiveness of Egypt’s Protected Area network (Zonation).

Add 10:15 Heathland management in the New Forest National Park
    Barbara Smith (Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust), Tom Birkett (Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust), Dan Carpenter (Natural History Museum)
   

The New Forest has the largest remaining area of lowland heath in Europe and is important for the diversity of its habitats and associated species.   We compared the effects of two management techniques (burning and cutting) on the vegetation and invertebrate communities and discuss the implications for biodiversity conservation and management in the New Forest National Park.

Add 10:30 Is more stakeholder involvement better for conservation?
    Juliette Young (CEH), Andrew Jordan (UEA), Kate Searle (CEH), Adam Butler (BIOSS), Daniel Chapman (CEH), Peter Simmons (UEA), Allan Watt (CEH)
   

Research on the implementation of Natura 2000 in Scotland found no relationship between stakeholder involvement and expected biodiversity outcomes. Social outcomes of increased stakeholder involvement, such as increased trust, did however increase the likelihood of positive future biodiversity outcomes. The findings indicate key aspects to consider in future efforts aimed at increasing stakeholder involvement in the management of protected areas.

Add 10:45 Biodiversity conservation and fisheries management
    Simon Jennings (Cefas)
   

Fisheries have wide-ranging impacts on marine biodiversity. Thus the ways that fisheries are conducted and managed will influence progress towards meeting targets for biodiversity conservation and management measures taken to meet biodiversity targets will affect fisheries. We comment on progress and propose some options for providing a reliable, internally consistent and trusted scientific evidence base to inform management decision making.

Add 11:30 Making ecological research relevant to practitioners
    William Sutherland (University of Cambridge)
   

There is still a gulf between those involved in research and those involved in practice. Bridging that gap is important for making our research relevant; futhermore there are increasing pressures and incentives to do so, such as the REF. I will describe a range of ways in which this can be achieved by changing both research and practice.

Add 11:45 LEFT: Local ecological footprinting tool
    Peter Long (University of Oxford), Lizzie Jeffers (University of Oxford), Neil Caithness (University of Oxford), Milo Thurston (University of Oxford), Matthias Smit (Statoil), Christian Collin-Hansen (Statoil), Jurgen Weissenberger (Statoil), Kathy Willis (University of Oxford)
   

LEFT is a tool which maps ecological value across landscapes.  The website automatically processes high-quality global data to produce 300m resolution maps of land cover,  numbers of globally threatened terrestrial vertebrate species, beta-diversity of terrestrial vertebrates and flowering plants, habitat fragmentation, habitat connectivity, numbers of migratory species and vegetation resilience.

Add 12:00 Management without targets: an open-ended approach
    Francine Hughes (Anglia Ruskin University), William Adams (University of Cambridge), Peter Stroh (Anglia Ruskin University)
   

Long-term ecosystem behaviour includes continual change at both large and small temporal and spatial scales. In order for habitat management to capture these ecosystem attributes it may be better to adopt an ‘open-ended ‘ approach rather than target-driven approaches. This paper will discuss when open-ended management is appropriate and its adoption at the Wicken Fen Vision project inEast Anglia.

Add 12:15 Planning translocations under a changing climate
    Alienor Chauvenet (ZSL), Nathalie Pettorelli (ZSL), John Ewen (ZSL), Doug Armstrong (Massey University), Tim Coulson (Imperial College London)
   

Climate change is forcing species to shift their range and those not capable of dispersing naturally could be translocated. Selecting suitable sites is paramount for success and habitat suitability modelling can be used to this effect. However, we show that model assumptions and validation should be based on a priori understanding of the impact of climate on species’ population dynamics.

Add 12:30 Empowering students through beyond-curriculum fusion of education with research: SERT, The Student Environment Research Team
    Anita Diaz (Bournemouth University), Roger Herbert (Bournemouth University), Anna Callum -anderson (Bournemouth University), Rosie Nicoll (Bournemouth University)
    SERT enables teams of undergraduate students to gain and demonstrate experience and skills by leading research in relevant professional practice contexts. SERT teams are led by student managers mentored by academics and professional practitioners. SERT also provides students with a web platform through which to produce living CVs. We present the opportunities and challenges of such a model.
Add 12:45 The effectiveness of Protected Areas under recent climatic change
    Phillipa Gillingham (Bournemouth University), Chris Thomas (University of York), Richard Bradbury (RSPB), David Roy (CEH), Barbara Anderson (University of York), John Baxter (SNH), Nigel Bourn (Butterfly Conservation), Humphrey Crick (Natural England), Richard Findon (DEFRA), Richard Fox (Butterfly Conservation), Jenny Hodgson (University of York), Alison Holt (University of Sheffield), Mike Morecroft (Natural England), Nina O'Hanlon (University of York), Tom Oliver (CEH), James Pearce-Higgins (BTO), Deborah Proctor (JNCC), Jeremy Thomas (University of Oxford), Kevin Walker (BSBI), Clive Walmsley (CCW), Robert Wilson (University of Exeter), Jane Hill (University of York)
   

Several authors have questioned the utility of Protected Areas (PAs) under climatic change, as species may change their distributions away from such locations. We consider northerly- and southerly distributed species within Great Britain, and quantify the effectiveness of PAs across a range of taxa during a period of recent climatic change.

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close