Effects of intensive harvesting on moose reproduction.

Published online
03 Nov 2000
Content type
Journal article
Journal title
Journal of Applied Ecology

Laurian, C. & Ouellet, J. P. & Courtois, R. & Breton, L. & St-Onge, S.

Publication language
Canada & Quebec


It has been hypothesized that a balanced adult sex ratio is necessary for the full participation of ungulate females in reproduction and therefore high productivity. We tested this general hypothesis using 2 approaches. First, using telemetry (n = 60 individuals) and annual aerial censuses between 1995 and 1998, we compared 2 moose (Alces alces) populations in Quebec, Canada, one non-harvested and the other subject to intensive sport harvesting from the end of September to mid-October. We tested the following predictions for the harvested population: (1) females increase movements and home ranges during the mating period; (2) the mating system is modified, with the appearance of groups of one male and many females; (3) subadult males participate in reproduction; (4) the mating period extends over 2-3 oestrus cycles; (5) the calving period extends over several months; and (6) productivity declines. Daily movements and home range sizes during the mating period did not differ between harvested and non-harvested populations. Most groups observed were male-female pairs. Subadult males (1.5-2.5 years old) were only observed with females in the harvested population. Mating and calving periods did not differ between populations. The proportion of females that gave birth and the number of calves produced were similar in the 2 populations. We also assessed the existence of a relationship between population productivity and percentage of males in various management units of the province of Quebec that were characterized by a wide range in sex ratios. Contrary to prediction the number of calves per 100 adult females was not related to the percentage of adult males in the population. The participation of young adult males (subadults) in reproduction in our harvested population may have compensated for the lower percentage of adult males, and thus productivity was unaffected. We therefore reject the hypothesis that intensive harvesting, at least at the level we observed, affects reproduction and population productivity. As there are some uncertainties regarding the long-term effects of high hunting pressure managers should favour sex ratios close to levels observed in non-harvested populations.

Key words