Depth-to-water mediates bryophyte response to harvesting in boreal forests.

Published online
21 Jul 2020
Content type
Journal article
Journal title
Journal of Applied Ecology

Bartels, S. F. & James, R. S. & Caners, R. T. & MacDonald, S. E.
Contact email(s)

Publication language
Canada & Alberta


Site moisture is an important component of the forest landscape for maintaining biodiversity, including forest-floor bryophytes. However, little is known about its role in shaping understorey responses to harvesting. We investigated the influence of site wetness, determined using a remotely sensed, topographic depth-to-water (DTW) index, on responses of bryophyte cover, richness, diversity and composition to variable retention harvesting (comparing: 2% [clear-cut], 20% and 50% dispersed green tree retention and uncut controls [100% retention]) in three boreal forest cover-types (broadleaf, mixed and conifer forests) in western Canada. The DTW index provides an approximation of DTW at or below the soil surface and was derived from wet-areas mapping based on discrete Airborne Laser Scanning data acquired over an experimentally harvested landscape located in north-western Alberta, Canada. The effectiveness of leaving retention (vs. clear-cutting) for conserving bryophyte communities depended on site wetness, as indicated by DTW, with the specifics varying among forest types. In broadleaf forests, bryophyte cover and richness were generally low and not much affected by harvesting but drier sites had higher richness and a few more unique species. In mixed and conifer forests, leaving retention (vs. clear-cutting) on wetter (vs. drier) sites was more effective for conserving bryophyte cover, wetter sites had higher total species richness and more species were exclusive to wetter sites. Synthesis and applications. Site wetness, as indicated using the remotely sensed topographic site wetness index "depth-to-water" mediates bryophyte responses to variable-retention harvests. Specifically, our results suggested that in conifer and mixed forests it would be more beneficial to target wetter sites for retention patches or dispersed retention whereas in broadleaf forests there might be a slight advantage to targeting drier sites. Our study demonstrates that this tool could be used to inform management decisions around leaving dispersed or patch retention.

Key words