EU Biofuel Policy: Environmental Implications
A new report published by Birdlife International suggests that EU’s biofuel policy could lead to global environmental harm.
The proposed legislation states that 10% of all fuels will be biofuels by 2020. The Commission proposal fails to consider the indirect impacts of biofuel production, including an increased use of European oil-seed rape driving demand for South-East Asian palm oil and soya expansion in the amazon resulting from US corn ethanol subsidies. Set-aside schemes (i.e. areas of farmland excluded from agricultural activities) will come under pressure from the Commission proposal. Wildlife that has thus far benefited from set-aside schemes and could be at risk, include corn marigold, insects such as the white-tailed bumblebee, as well as the brown hare and the lapwing.
BirdLife International has called upon EU decision makers to drop the 10% biofuel target, and made a series of recommendations.
Do BES members and blog readers believe that this legislation should be introduced? Are the recommendations and calls to EU decision makers in the report realistic/enforceable?
The BES welcomes comment and debate on this article.
Like what we stand for?
Support our mission and help develop the next generation of ecologists by donating to the British Ecological Society.